In September 2005, Intel filed its response to an AMD lawsuit,[52] disputing AMD's claims, and stating that its business practices are fair and lawful. In its rebuttal, Intel laid out the skeleton of its legal defense, which included a deconstruction of AMD's offensive strategy and levied the charge that AMD's long struggling market position is largely a result of bad business decisions and management incompetence, including underinvestment in essential manufacturing capacity and over-reliance on contracting out chip foundries.[53]Legal experts predict the lawsuit will most likely drag out for a number of years, since Intel's response indicates they are not likely to try to settle with AMD.[54][55] A court date has been granted in 2010.[56]In October 2006, a Transmeta lawsuit was filed against Intel for patent infringement covering computer architecture and power efficiency technologies.[57] In October 2007, the Transmeta-Intel lawsuit was settled, with Intel agreeing to pay an initial US$150 million and US$20 million per year for the next 5 years. Both companies agreed to drop lawsuits against each other while Intel was granted a perpetual non-exclusive license to use current and future patented Transmeta technologies in its chips for 10 years
Welcome
My sponsors
Blog Archive
-
▼
2008
(28)
-
▼
November
(28)
- Intel's Core 2
- Intel Most Recogniable computer
- Significant participator
- AMDI law suit
- European union
- Carbon tetra chloride
- History
- Intel's Evolution
- Scale of x buissness
- Origin of name
- Scrams
- In 1983.....
- Drams
- Microprocessors
- 380's Microprocesors
- Intel 486
- pentium FDIV
- Intel inside
- Two factors combined
- Apple's Announcement
- Company release a print advertisment
- Robert noyce was intel CEO
- Intel has diversity initiative
- Intel corporation
- AMD law suit
- Intel is significant Participation
- Capitalization of intel is $129.34
- Sillicon Valley
-
▼
November
(28)
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)